Demand & peaks
15-minute peak, contracted capacity and the risk of exceeding it, before it happens.
- Actual
- Forecast P50
- Likely range P10–P90
- Contracted capacity 1,250 kW
Example
Wattwise machine learning learns what normal consumption is for each site, and AI explains where and why energy is lost and what it costs in lari.
A pilot on one site in about 4 weeks.
Most plants do not know when and where energy is lost.
This is how Wattwise works at one plant, in two cases: first a measurement error that would have spoiled the monthly balance, then a real loss the balance revealed. Both cases are examples.
Loss over the last 15 minutes is 5-10% above the norm. The alert arrives within a minute in the platform and on Telegram, with the cost already in lari.
Lilo plant · High
Loss is 5-10% above the norm · +10.9 ₾ per hour
When the episode ends, the AI writes a report with the fact, a similar past case and its own interpretation kept apart. It does not present an assumption as a fact.
Lilo plant · 07.10 · ±6 h
From 09:00 to 12:00 the loss averaged 85.8 kWh/h, 5-10% above the norm.
In March: a blown voltage-circuit fuse on workshop A’s meter.
The incoming meter shows the usual load; the rise matches a drop in workshop C’s meter reading. A measurement problem is more likely than a real loss.
The cause turned out to be measurement, not a real loss. The engineer approves the report and records the cause. Those three hours are flagged in the balance, so the month’s balance stays correct.
The cause is saved and used when analysing future incidents.
14 October, Lilo plant
Even after the error was fixed, the balance kept showing 121 kWh a day above the norm. Wattwise traced the excess loss to workshop B’s feeder: the compressor’s cosφ had dropped to 0.78, the current rose, and the cable and transformer lost more. After a capacitor bank was installed on the feeder, the loss went back to the norm.
Over a year that is ≈ 10,200 ₾: exactly what the balance called recoverable.
Two tools, each with its own job. Machine learning learns from your data what is normal and what will happen. AI explains those numbers in plain language and never makes them up.
Numbers from your own data
7 / 8
weeks the actual landed inside the forecast range
4.8%
average miss
Why tomorrow’s forecast is higher than usual
On pilot data+3.1%Each forecast is made a week ahead, from the site’s own history. When the actual falls outside the range, you see the reason separately.
Example
Text where every claim has a source
Average night load rose from 212 to 250 kW (+18%). Most of the increase comes from compressor #2.
Night load increase · kW · 14 days
Source: hourly data · 2 tools
It is probably running idle at night. An on-site check is needed.
Workshop C’s meter had a blown voltage-circuit fuse.
Cause saved to the knowledge base
INC-2026-041: same meter, same symptom. Check the voltage-circuit fuse first.
Example
Live power, daily consumption and losses for every site, in real time.
Wattwise / Whole company · 3 sites
07.10 · 14:32
Current power
1,748 kW
Today
20,973 kWh
Loss · last hour
61.2 kWh
Today’s active and reactive power
kW kvar Yesterday
Example
15-minute peak, contracted capacity and the risk of exceeding it, before it happens.
Example
Month-end consumption and cost with a likely range (P10–P90), and the chance you will exceed the budget.
69%
Chance that October ends over budget
P50 ≈ 1,084,000 · P10–P90 ≈ 1,049,000–1,119,000 · Budget ≈ 1,070,000 kWh
Example
Also: monthly PDF and Excel reports, data-quality checks, user roles and access control.
Losses, anomalies and budget deviations are shown as financial impact.
The draft budget comes from the forecast; deviations split into volume and price effects.
A monthly report with an AI summary, in PDF and Excel.
Which site, which machine, and what a change is worth.
Example
SCADA, meters and files in a shared data model.
Alerts arrive straight away in the platform and on Telegram, not at month end.
Periods, working and non-working hours, kWh/m² and kWh per unit produced.
The AI assistant searches, compares and explains, with sources.
| Site | kW | Today kWh | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tbilisi, Lilo plant | 1,120 | 13,847 | ▲ 2.3% |
| Rustavi, plant | 503 | 5,669 | ▲ 4.2% |
| Batumi, warehouse | 125 | 1,457 | ▼ 1.8% |
Filter: whole company · today · all sources
Example
A condition score: falling efficiency, rising base load, changes in the operating cycle.
Reactive balance and its effect on technical losses.
15-minute peak from 1-minute data, loading in kVA and an overload forecast.
“Frozen” values, balance residuals and missing data are shown separately, as a data-quality signal.
Workshop B · compressor
61 / 100
Example
Nothing to install. Your system sends the data itself; nothing is opened in your network and nothing is written to SCADA.
By agreement: OPC UA, Modbus
Outbound only, encrypted HTTPS
Never writes to SCADA and never controls equipment
Browser and Telegram
Alerts in the platform and in Telegram
If SCADA sits in an isolated network, the data is sent by the Historian or by a server in the DMZ. If that is not possible either, we start with files.
We prove the result on one site first. Then you decide whether to expand.
Week 1
We learn about your site, meters and data sources.
Week 2
SCADA or files are connected; tags are mapped to equipment.
Week 3
Our power engineer sets up the balance and normal loss with you.
Week 4
You receive the first report: losses, anomalies and recommendations.
First report · Lilo plant
Timings are indicative and depend on the data source.
Usually nothing. Your SCADA, Historian or metering system sends the data over HTTPS. If that is not possible, we start with CSV or XLSX files.
Wattwise is not tied to any one manufacturer. We take data in a standard format (JSON or CSV), so any system that can export data can be connected. OPC UA and Modbus are added by agreement.
Readings from the main and workshop meters, ideally hourly or more often, and the history of recent months if you have it. The balance can be calculated from day one; the forecast gets more accurate the more history there is. We confirm the tariff and the site diagram together in the first week of the pilot.
A pilot on one site takes about 4 weeks. In week 4 you receive the first report: losses, anomalies and recommendations. The timing depends on the data source.
Pricing depends on the number of sites and data channels. Pilot terms are agreed individually. Write to us and we will send an estimate.
As accurate as your meters. The balance uses formulas checked by a power engineer. When the numbers do not add up, the system flags a meter or ratio problem instead of reporting it as a loss.
Wattwise flags it as a data-quality problem: a missing period, a “frozen” value or an unusual balance residual is shown separately, and you get an alert. Such a period is not counted as loss.
On a secured server operated only by Wattwise. Data travels over encrypted channels, each company’s data is isolated from the others, and it is backed up regularly.
In the first 4 weeks of the pilot, our power engineer sets up the balance and normal loss together with you, so the first results show within that time. The forecast gets more accurate as history builds up: seeing seasonal changes takes several months of data.
No. The AI only reads your data and offers an explanation or a recommendation. It cannot change settings, data or equipment, and an incident report becomes official only after a person approves it.
No. The machine learning models are trained separately for each company, only on its own data. Your data is given to the AI assistant only to prepare the answer to a specific question, and it is not used to train general AI models.
Write to us. In a 30-minute call we will show you the platform and assess what data a pilot could start with. You don’t need any plant data for the meeting.